> деассемблировать существующие структуры - это либертарианизм.
Нет. Это анархизм. Или социализм с "разрушим до основания, а затем". Или другие революционные движения.
Но к либертарианизму это просто не имеет ровно никакого отношения. Не больше, чем к пожарникам или шахматным клубам.
> the muslims - he will have to take THAT one back. Why would he? He seems to be able to say and do anything he wants without any repercussions. But he might, just like he did with immigration. He has no positions of his own aside from "Trump is Great." Everything else can be changed based on expediency. It really will be fun trying to find a iota of difference between these two corrupt soulless opportunists.
no subject
Нет. Это анархизм. Или социализм с "разрушим до основания, а затем".
Или другие революционные движения.
Но к либертарианизму это просто не имеет ровно никакого отношения. Не больше, чем к пожарникам или шахматным клубам.
> the muslims - he will have to take THAT one back.
Why would he? He seems to be able to say and do anything he wants without any repercussions.
But he might, just like he did with immigration.
He has no positions of his own aside from "Trump is Great." Everything else can be changed based on expediency.
It really will be fun trying to find a iota of difference between these two corrupt soulless opportunists.