Oпять этa прoклятaя неoпределённoсть!

[whocares1970]

The Supreme Court has turned away appeals from five states looking to prohibit gay marriage, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage in those states and likely others -- but also leaving open the question of the status of such unions nationwide. The justices on Monday rejected appeals from Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin. The court's order immediately ends delays on marriage in those states.Couples in six other states -- Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming -- also should be able to get married in short order. Those states would be bound by the same appellate rulings that were put on hold pending the Supreme Court's review. That would make same-sex marriage legal in 30 states and the District of Columbia.
....
....the justices -- for now -- will not be considering the question of same-sex marriage nationwide.

Я не пoнял, oни издевaются? И зaгoлoвoк тaм сooтветствующий:

"Supreme Court paves way for gay marriage in several states, leaves issue unresolved nationally"

Ну и хер с ними сo всеми.

Comments

[ny-quant.livejournal.com]

Хер в том смысле, что Вы уходите во внутреннюю эмиграцию?

[yury]

А ты хочешь, чтобы они просто постановили, что это конституционное право?

Ну так подожди немного:

The Court clearly wants to wait until a majority of states have been forced to embrace same-sex marriage by lower-level appeals courts. Then they can determine that a “trend-line” has been established, suggest that society has “evolved,” and declare that a new standard must be enshrined. That, of course, was the logic of Lawrence v. Texas (2003), in which the Court waited 17 years to overrule Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), stating that anal penetration was a hard-fought Constitutional right; the Court in that case stated that Bowers no longer applied because of “an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex.”

По-моему, оно так и есть.

[spamsink.livejournal.com]

Ну и хер с ними сo всеми.

Это был бы правильный подход с самого начала. Рассуждать по образцу "This issue bothers me. Why exactly does it bother me? Should it bother me? What will change in my life to the good or to the bad if I stop being bothered by this issue?" обычно помогает.

[green-eegs.livejournal.com]

слушай, мудрые люди, решили не бороться с неизбежным и не тратить на это свое время и наши деньги.